Copyright 2000 The New York Times March 1, 2000 Every Bite You Take, They'll Be Watching You By AMANDA HESSER As you savor your tuna tartare in an elegant dining room, your companion may not be the only one to notice you are ignoring the sesame toasts the chef has made to accompany it. The chef may be fretting about it, too. While he observes you on a video screen in the kitchen. As you blithely eat your meal, he may be watching for the moment you put your fork down, so he can get your next course rolling. And you may never know it, unless you look up to the ceiling and spot the cookie-size lens of the camera above your table. Even in restaurants that have not invested in video technology, your name, phone number, address and even where you work may be stored away on a computer hard drive without your knowledge. Computers have been in restaurants for years, but until recently they were mainly used to convey orders from the dining room to the kitchen. Now, they can track how much wine you drink, how often you order the foie gras, how much you tip and how many times you didn't show up for a reservation. In a city where people prize anonymity almost more than fame, restaurants are increasingly adding surveillance and information gathering to their functions. Chefs and restaurateurs say that the better they know their customers, the better they can serve them, monitoring the pace of a meal, for example, or always "remembering" to deliver your martini with olives rather than onions. But restaurateurs aren't exactly boasting about their new technology. The cameras at Daniel are an open secret in the restaurant world, though most diners are unaware of them. In 1993, Daniel Boulud installed them around the dining room at the former Daniel, now Cafe Boulud. They're still up and running, and he has installed a video system in the new Daniel as well, where the monitors are in plain view for any visitor to the kitchen. Although Mr. Boulud did not return calls to discuss them, his publicist, Georgette Farkas, said the system is essential. "He can keep an eye on the front of the house and the kitchen at the same time," Ms. Farkas said. The cameras are positioned around the dining room and capture three to four tables each. In the kitchen, Mr. Boulud has several screens set up next to his station, so that at a glance he can switch from viewing the employee locker room to seeing how a table is progressing on its first course. The images are a lot like those on the surveillance cameras in a 7-Eleven: you can see what diners are wearing, but not their jewelry, for instance. At Aureole Las Vegas, Charlie Palmer, the chef, said he installed a video system to keep track of all that goes on in the restaurant, which is much larger than Aureole in New York. His system is more advanced than the one at Daniel: 16 cameras are positioned around the dining rooms. The image quality is nearly as good as a television screen. "You can zoom and see they're almost done with the first course, actually zoom in and see the plates," Mr. Palmer said. Though they are essentially surveillance cameras, the clarity is good enough, he said, that you can tell, "if the fork's on the plate." Or if a celebrity is misbehaving with a date, as Mr. Palmer said he and a few cooks observed on a recent evening. Mark Stech-Novak, a kitchen designer, is installing cameras in the Roy's restaurants around the country, starting with the new Roy's in San Francisco, which is to open in July. Rocco DiSpirito, the chef at Union Pacific, expects to have video cameras installed there by this summer. The newer digital cameras will be clearer than the others, and have better zooming capability and remote access -- which means that if Mr. DiSpirito goes on vacation he can log on to his computer, and look into the dining room. Though just a very few restaurants have invested in cameras for their dining rooms -- a system costs $15,000 to $100,000, Mr. Stech-Novak said -- many, many more are using their reservations computers to monitor their clientele. New software allows restaurants to build a much larger and more detailed database -- and offers them countless ways to use the information. Credit card companies also gather information for restaurants. American Express, for instance, can come up with lists of card members who spend above a given amount, or card members who dine frequently in a particular restaurant. Then, that restaurant can, through a third party, send an offer to these card members, either in their credit card statement or in a restaurant newsletter. The Diners Club card provides similar services to restaurants. Of course, keeping close tabs on the customers isn't just the result of new technology. Good restaurants have always been savvy about recalling the drinks or tables that regulars like. Often, that data was written into a captain's or waiter's notepad. For example, at Oceana in Midtown, Felix Marrufo, the captain, keeps a detailed black book. His notes read like formulas, specific to diners. For one man, there is "menu immediately, Pellegrino, likes Maine oysters, no mignonette, elderly man with young Asian companion." For another, it's "tap water, espresso, rush." Now, the restaurant is entering Mr. Marrufo's notes into a new computer database, so all of its employees will know diners almost as well as he does. Some restaurants are buying software like RSViP and Perfect Host, specifically designed to handle reservations, and using it to track customers. But many more are joining one of the new online reservations services, which provide the software as part of the package, even if the restaurant has not gone online. Oceana, for example, is using the software supplied by OpenTable.com. "The primary value is definitely the database and being able to record the history of your guests -- no question," said Paul McLaughlin, the restaurant's general manager. All the software works essentially the same way: when diners call or go online to make a reservation, they are added to the database, with their telephone numbers and any other information they share. On some programs, each diner's file has categories for address, e-mail address, food preferences, date of first visit, profession, favorite server and V.I.P. status. "There are so many restaurants out there," said Massimo Felici, the owner of La Nonna in Manhattan, who uses software from Foodline.com to track patrons. "You don't want to lose any customers." The software helps in other ways, too: It allows restaurants to track patrons who do not honor reservations. A reservationist might not recognize a no-show's name, but databases always do. They keep track of the number of times a diner has not shown up for his reservation; that information comes up when the diner calls and the reservationist taps the name into the computer. "If I have to squeeze you in on a booked Saturday night and I see that you didn't come in when you made a reservation, I'll give that table to another customer," Mr. Felici said. Some online reservation programs, like OpenTable.com, have more elaborate no-show features: the program counts your no-shows, and if you reach three, sends you an e-mail pointing it out. The idea, said Andy England, OpenTable's vice president for marketing, is to shame the diner into changing his ways. Steve Hanson, an owner of several Manhattan restaurants, including Ruby Foo's Dim Sum and Sushi Palace and the Blue Water Grill, uses Perfect Host to integrate information from all his restaurants, so that if you're a regular at Blue Water Grill and go to Atlantic Grill, another of his restaurants, you'll be treated like a regular there, too: the manager might greet you by name, for example. And if you're not a regular, you will also be marked. When Marshall Goldberg, a senior director for housing of Project Return, a social services group in Manhattan, tried to make a reservation at Ruby Foo's on the Upper West Side a few months ago, the reservationist asked for his phone number. Mr. Goldberg gave him the number. A moment passed, and he was told he was not in their system. When Mr. Goldberg asked what would have happened had he been, the reservationist informed him that it would have shown his rating, and that had his rating been high enough, they might have been able to take care of him. Mr. Hanson denies rating his customers, although his system does keep a count of the number of times a diner has visited. "This was just an uninformed host," he said. "We were obviously full. If it had been a regular customer who comes in all the time, I would have wanted a manager to see if they could find a way for him to get in." Danny Meyer, a restaurateur who is known for personal service, has installed software from OpenTable.com at Eleven Madison Park. Eventually, it will be installed in his other restaurants -- Union Square Cafe, Tabla and Gramercy Tavern -- said Nick Mautone, the general manager of Gramercy Tavern. If you're a regular at Eleven Madison Park and you're put on the waiting list, Mr. Meyer said, "I would absolutely want to see it help you on the wait list." He added that a new feature of the software will soon allow him to organize the wait list based on customer profiles -- for instance, to keep a 50-50 balance between new and returning customers. At Jean Georges, the Perfect Host software allows the restaurant to print up a card for each party coming in that day. On it are the name of the host, table number, number in the party and any important notes on the diner who made the reservation. When the host arrives, a staff member records on the card a symbol for the person's sex and attire and sends the customer to the bar. The captain is then given the card and is able to identify the person at the bar without having to ask his (or her) name a second time. There are other notes, too, like "likes small table" or "wine connoisseur." A few weeks ago, Ken Yeh, a vice president at Christie's who advises Asian clients, went to Jean Georges for dinner. His card reads: "Super regular customer at JoJo. Was in JG for tasting menu on Monday night this week. Third visit in 10 days for Mr. Yeh." (It also noted him as a PPX, for personne particulièrement extraordinaire, a restaurant term for V.I.P.) "That's quite amazing," Mr. Yeh said when he was read his restaurant dossier. Though astonished at the detail, Mr. Yeh said he wasn't offended. But it did lead him to reminisce about the years when he dined on long tasting menus at the former Bouley in TriBeCa, which were customized so that no course was ever repeated. And there was no computer to keep tabs. While most restaurants are subtle in how they gather their information, some are aggressive. The Kimpton Restaurant Group, which owns restaurants around the country, including Mossant Bistro in Chicago and the Grand Café in San Francisco, gives servers a form for collecting information on guests. "There is no expectation they have to fill it out," said Andrew Freeman, a public relations representative for the group. "They can write down the name, the table they were at and whatever you get on them." That might include what wine you drank or where you work. Then the information is entered into the computer. "It gives us the opportunity to personalize almost every guest experience," he added. Or to be a little nosy. Restaurants have always thrived on the see-and-be-seen appeal. At the Brasserie in Midtown, a camera is placed at the door so that images of entering diners are transmitted to screens above the bar for all to see. "That was all part of the design elements that the architects wanted, because they see dining as a voyeuristic experience," said Dana Madigan, the general manager. But being watched from the kitchen with a hidden camera lacks the same kind of honesty. The people who serve you in restaurants have always been able to see your every move, but the new technology is colder, more efficient, sneakier. "I think the great part of the whole dining experience is intimacy, and that blows it," said Drew Nieporent, an owner of Nobu, Montrachet and other restaurants in New York. "If you know there's going to be a camera anywhere in the restaurant, the next thing is going to be a microphone under the table, and that's not fair." Chefs like Mr. Palmer of Aureole and Mr. DiSpirito of Union Pacific defend the use of cameras as a practical measure to get around unreliable servers. "It's not the same as the chef being able to flick a switch and verify himself that it's time to fire the foie gras, bake the soufflé or whatever," said Mr. Stech-Novak, the owner of Mark Stech-Novak Restaurant Consultation and Design in Oakland, Calif. "You can't rely on people's words. A picture is worth a thousand words." Roy Yamaguchi, the chef and owner of Roy's restaurants, is considering cameras not just to monitor the dining room, but also to allow chefs in one restaurant to show others at another location in the chain how to prepare new dishes. Dpon Netmedia, a company in Houston that makes digital monitoring systems that can be linked to the Internet, has recently begun marketing them to restaurants. With its system, a chef can move the cameras and zoom in closely. Very closely. Mark Kelley, the sales director, said a camera 10 feet above a table can zoom in close enough to see what you are writing on a check. The images, which show up on a computer screen placed in the kitchen, can be saved, and if the chef is away from the restaurant, he can log on and see what is going on in the dining room, kitchen or wherever the cameras are pointed. Dan Yeh, the owner of the company (and no relation to Ken Yeh), said restaurants could also set up Web sites and allow real-time viewing of the dining room or kitchen on the Internet. It's a possibility that makes sharing an evening on a restaurant's kitchen monitor seem private in comparison. This is the system that Union Pacific plans to install this summer. Mr. DiSpirito estimates that cameras will increase the restaurant's efficiency by 35 to 40 percent. By being able to see how a table's meal is progressing without waiting for a server to tell him, he said, he can keep the meal better timed. And, Mr. DiSpirito added, he can avoid delays, such as when a waiter forgets to set down the proper flatware, and the kitchen has to wait before sending out the food. But if the cooks have an eye on your table, who's watching the fish on the burner? So far, no one has invented that technology. Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company